Is Andy Delin the new Scoble? A Microsoft blogger with enough balls / management support to say what he thinks even when it may not be completely obsequious? Let's hope so... especially after I post this up there!
His recent review of Outlook 2007 : "so far I haven't found too many changes of significance... In my opinion, Outlook is an irony - a productivity tool which distracts and overloads. Outlook knows so much about me - my contacts, my activities, my communications - and yet it doesn't use this knowledge to guide what information should be given or hidden in a given context."
He's also made some very interesting insights into why my decision to go back to pen and paper is a good one (and, by the way, I'm still loving it):
Trustworthy. Exactly. I've lost SO MUCH DATA from Outlook and my PDA over the years it's disgusting. The whole OST / PST mindfield that Microsoft imposes on you in the name of an Outlook backup is still a complete joke. If I want to find a particular email from the last ten years that I wrote in Outlook, first I'd need to find the right PST. I've got them all backed up on CD somewhere, but there is about 20 of the suckers. Each time I re-built my laptop I had to back it up and then would normally start a new one to get the old one off my harddrive. Not to mention the many times I had to re-build Outlook due to PST corruptions. So I'd have to import various PSTs into Outlook and then search the lot of them for the right email.
Now compare that to finding a Gmail message from 2004 (when I started using it in anger). Takes two seconds. One maybe.
Anyway... paper is good. I'm loving it. However, I still haven't worked out a good way to back it up without doing a daily scan.