In little over a month, podcasting will celebrate its first
birthday (that is, if you take the birth of the medium to be Adam Curry’s
launch of ipodder – let’s not get into a fight over it). In its first year
of existence, podcasting has become something of a phenomenon. With most podcast
directories now indexing over 4000 shows, and most of those being unaffiliated
with a traditional media outlet, we’ve witnessed a Cambrian explosion in
independent audio programming. A year
ago, if you wanted to listen to audio content during the day, you were at the
mercy of your local radio stations. How many options did you have? 20? 50?
Today you can choose from thousands of shows to listen to. Podcasting has been
talked about by every major news organization on the planet. Many have gone on
to start their own podcasts.
So… that was Year One. What is going to happen in Year Two?
Will the bubble burst? Will every man, woman and child on the planet have their
own show? Is radio dead?
In the 11 year history of the Web we’ve seen many
discontinuous innovations appear and traverse the “hype curve”.
This curve predicts that new products and services will be talked up by the
press, analysts and investors when they first arrive in the marketplace because
that’s what drives their businesses. Expectations for the new innovation are
blown totally out of proportion until, inevitably, the new companies that arise
to exploit these innovations fail to meet those expectations of the market. The
next phase of the cycle involves disillusionment and abandonment. The same
press, analysts and investors that hyped up the innovation dump it
unceremoniously and move on to the next “new big thing”. This is often followed
by a knowing nod of the head by people who “knew this wasn’t going to work” and
by investors wondering why they didn’t sell the stock a month before, when it
was at its peak. It is also followed, however, by lots of hard work by the
businesses that continue to develop the innovation and proceed through “the
chasm”. Remember the “crash” of B2C and the whole “e-business is just business”
faux business wisdom that followed? Now look up Amazon and eBay’s revenues,
profits and market cap.
Geoffrey Moore, in his 1991 book "Crossing The Chasm", describes a chasm that exists between the early adopters (the
technology enthusiasts and visionaries) of a product or service that is
introduced by a discontinuous innovation and the early majority (the
pragmatists). This chasm exists because visionaries and pragmatists have very different
expectations and buying behaviour.
I believe podcasting will experience a chasm, a sudden decline
in hype, but when this will occur, we cannot predict. A decline in hype,
however, usually doesn’t indicate a decline in demand, but merely a
recalibration. When the chasm hits podcasting, it will simply signal the time
to address the demands of the early majority. Watch the birds fly, though, when
it happens.
Let’s look for a moment at the question of whether or not
there is a business to be built around podcasting.
In the last couple of months I’ve read many articles
suggesting that a business model for podcasting doesn’t exist. Most of those
articles seem to miss a few of key facts.
FACT #1 – The
Business Model Already Exists.
Advertising on audio programming already exists in a very
big way. In 2003, worldwide radio plus out-of-home advertising spend was
USD$55.5 billion and is expected to increase to an estimated $71 billion in
2008. We don’t need to invent a new business model. This isn’t the huge leap
that advertisers had to make in the late 1990s to get their heads around online
advertising. And ask any honest advertiser and they will probably admit that
they know their radio spend isn’t very effective. When your advertisement is
being broadcast out to hundreds of thousands of people of every age, race,
income and gender, you don’t really know with whom you are communicating. You
have no means of tracking it.
FACT #2 - This Isn’t
Online Advertising.
I’ve read comparisons of podcasting subscriber levels to
website traffic with the accompanying suggestion that CPM models used for
banner advertisements can be applied to podcasting. Obviously radio advertising
doesn’t work under those models and neither will podcasting.
FACT #3 – Podcasting
Is The Evolution Of Radio, Not Just Another Vehicle For Radio.
The economics of radio requires it to create shows which
appeal to broad audience demographics. This inevitably leads to the
watering-down of programming. In addition, federal regulatory bodies such as
the FCC in the United States censor radio content, sometimes to the extreme, so
we end up with radio programming which doesn't talk how we talk, doesn't talk
about the subjects we talk about and, essentially, does not represent either
who we are or who we want to become. It no longer represents us, especially the
15 – 35 age demographic. The economics of podcasting is at the other extreme to
radio. We don't have to buy a multi-million dollar broadcasting licence. We
simply use a PC. It costs us practically nothing to produce a podcast and a
small amount of money to host and distribute the shows. Our marketing is done
through blogging, not through multi-million dollar television commercials.
Thanks to our economic model, we can produce shows for global niche audiences
cost effectively, making our shows more relevant to our audiences and more effective
channels for advertisers to communicate their messages in a targeted fashion.
So, in summary, I’m convinced that podcasting is here to
stay but that the hype it is experiencing at the moment will be transitory.
There are several business models emerging (a content play versus a platform
play) and a lot of work to be done on making shows easy to find and easy to
subscribe to. By working together in groups such as The Podcast Network and the
International Nanocasting Alliance to improve standards and solve
infrastructure issues, we will gradually build podcasting into a stable and
viable industry and as a legitimate channel for advertising and entertainment.
Just remember one thing – revolutions always take longer
than the dreams of the entrepreneurs who start them. As my old boss Bill Gates is
fond of stating "most people overestimate what is going to happen in the
next two or three years and underestimate what is going to happen in the next
decade."




I am no business expert and thus I look at podcasting in a different way that you and Mick are atm. I think podcasting done right could be great for advertisers as it is easier to target a particular market than you can on general radio. You can target your ads to people interested in what your selling..I guess it si similar to google ads in that the ads shown reflect the site your visiting in most cases.
The people who listen to Dawn and Drew (raises hand) normally won't attract the same market as maybe IT conversations or maybe a podcast about knitting. Advertisers can target those different markets thouh and make better use of their dollars and I think it would be more cost-effective to advertise via podcasts than it is for them to advertise on radio.
With radio as long as you have enough money and it's not totally offensive you can probably buy advertising time on any station but will you also get the target you want. Maybe if you advertise on JJJ or MMM you may get the 15-35 crowd but I think they are two totally different markets.
Podcasting is the next big thing and how long it will stay there is uncertain. As I mentioned in a different post it is radio when you want it meaning you can download a show but you don't have to tune in at a particular time to listen but can listen to it in a few days if you wish, the choice is yours. This is the way of the future as people are doing more and have less time to do things like watching tv or listening to the radio at a specific time. Just look how successful VCR's were and now DVD-recorders and PVR's where you can record shows and watch at your leisure.
It is the future and will only get better.
As I said I am a listener and not a business person but I know almost always use my Ipod for podcasts and not music anymore. I haven't listened to the radio in years but I kind of feel like I am listening to radio but I am listening to what I want, not what they want me to listen to ;)
Hope I made sense
Posted by: Tony | Monday, June 27, 2005 at 12:34 AM
I got completly annoyed by the fact over the weekend, that i could not put the gnomedex stream to pause - similar to Cam's episode outside the kindergarden it already has changed the way I accept media to be.
And while I have not listened to Radio in a very long time, never bought an audio book and only do watch TV for events like penalty shooting at soccer, I do listen to podcast. I am listening to one now. Advertisement? Okay with me, as long as they are interesting to me.
And with the kind of podcast, I listen to, I should be an easy 'target' for that - let's say for somebody offering me a coupon if I really would want to buy a x41 when it comes out.
Which tells you another problem, advertisement has to face: A show about tablet pc, produced in US for an Aussie network is listened to by a German and she tells her friends in Portugal about it.
Some advertisers must get nuts about that ... :))
Posted by: Nicole Simon | Monday, June 27, 2005 at 09:42 PM
Nic - yeah, they will, but we have a plan to take care of it! Stay tuned!
Posted by: Cameron Reilly | Monday, June 27, 2005 at 10:09 PM
You guys have plans for evrything. If your correct then it sounds like you have set up a pretty good business model indeed, and I know nothing about business..LOL
Posted by: Tony | Monday, June 27, 2005 at 11:34 PM
I've given up on TV news. I've given up on music radio (and/or radio music). After the first dozen or so podcasts I heard, I almost gave up on podcasts.
I've been watching TPN's development with a bit the whimsey I'm sure the old guys on the porch felt as they watched all the kids try to jump onto the bandwagon.
And now I think I owe you a "thank you" for helping make quality in podcasts something I no longer think is a lost cause or a needle in a haystack. Because of your efforts (and others'), I think there is a bit of hope for listeners and encouragement for producers. Here's to a second year. Hopefully you'll drive this bandwagon somewhere nice. :)
Posted by: sirshannon | Tuesday, June 28, 2005 at 06:23 PM